President's Record

Status
Not open for further replies.
O

OrangeCrest

Guest
squirtgun said:
Dale,
I'm just a simple Southwest GA redneck that doesn't play games with peoples words and there was no hidden meanings as to how I feel about war in what I typed.It was an honest opinion,from someone whom doesn't pretend to be smarter than the rest of the world.
Basically you stated you would support a war if the circumstances suited your needs.I'm saying that every war is justified to someone.This one was justified to the vast majority of americans until it became PC not to support it.
Really is my viewpoint so threatening to people who don't think like I do,that they have to try and read between the lines to find some hidden meaning in my words?Really there isn't any.Just observations from a simple man.
Damn,why do I get myself into these political debates,politicains rank right up there with carsalesmen in my book.You can't live without them,and you can't drown them all.
LOL!

Just go with it Squirt!!

I supported the Afganistan war, but Iraq? Nope... That was wrong... Maybe if it were not so tied up in so much deception, perhaps Bush could have convinced me that it was something that had to be done, but when you insult the intelligence of your people, you will never regain their loyalty no matter what you do...
 

Mark

Moderator / Sponsor
It is great that we can all voice our opinions.

Lets keep it clean though.

<i>The attacks on Christians, President Bush's
daughters, and V.P. Cheney's daughter were
out of line.</i>
 

Clean County

New Member
Bush and Mr. Flip Flopper Kerry both voted to go to war so where is the debate?? The President and Mr. Flip Flopper were both given somewhat improper intelligence but once again they BOTH voted to go to war. Yes the President and the other guy voted differently on how to spend money to help our troops over there. Bush voted to spend the Money to help our guys and the other guy......I don't think he even knows for certain what he voted for.

Oh yea its was great getting that tax money back from Bush a few years ago. The ones who were against that I bet none of them refused there hard earned tax check and sent it back.

Bush will win..or at least should just like he did the last time and once again its going to be a close one. It looks like after Bush wins the next candidate the Democrats will support is Billary Clinton.....Now theres a scary thought. I'm sure will see a bunch of Democrats voting for the Great Republican Rudolph Guilliani when the time comes. Ahh don't you just love being a business owner:)
 

oneness

New Member
OrangeCrest said:
Major difference here... We attacked without being attacked...

First time in U.S. history we have ever attacked a country without being attacked.

Actually, our recent action in Iraq was simply a continuation of the action started in 1991, when Saddam invaded Kuwait and we drove him back. We agreed to a cease fire based on many conditions Saddam was to have met...He didn't, so we went back in. This time we finished what we started. There was no peace treaty or anything else ending that first war...We simply stopped fighting to allow Saddam to disarm...It isn't our fault he refused...He was give AMPLE opportunity.

I agree with Roger...the rest of your post isn't worthy of comment...Just more anti-Bush personal attacks without any substance.
 
O

OrangeCrest

Guest
oneness said:
Actually, our recent action in Iraq was simply a continuation of the action started in 1991, when Saddam invaded Kuwait and we drove him back. We agreed to a cease fire based on many conditions Saddam was to have met...He didn't, so we went back in. This time we finished what we started. There was no peace treaty or anything else ending that first war...We simply stopped fighting to allow Saddam to disarm...It isn't our fault he refused...He was give AMPLE opportunity.

I agree with Roger...the rest of your post isn't worthy of comment...Just more anti-Bush personal attacks without any substance.

Well there was a thought that I haven't taken into consideration.... I would have to actually see about the treaty, I think there was one when Clinton was in office, but perhaps not...

As for Roger's comments, just some of the same coming back... You know, back wash...

Check out the article I posted and log onto the forum, puts this conversation into low priority...
 

CaroliProWash

New Member
Mark said:
It is great that we can all voice our opinions.

Lets keep it clean though.

<i>The attacks on Christians, President Bush's
daughters, and V.P. Cheney's daughter were
out of line.</i>

Thank you Mark -

Celeste
 

Dan S

New Member
Dan S said:
Subject: Records
2004 Election Voter Guide

Depending on the way you lean, the following information
could have a bearing on decisions you make in November 2004.

Issues of Importance = *

* Gay Marriage:
President Bush is opposed.
John Kerry favors.

* Partial-Birth Abortion:
President Bush is opposed.
John Kerry favors.

* Restoring voluntary prayer in the public schools:
President Bush Favors.
John Kerry is Opposed.

* Mel Gibson & the making of a film about Christ:
President Bush supports Gibson.
John Kerry participated in Left's assault on Gibson, suggesting
possible anti-Semitism even though Kerry had not seen the film.

* Boy Scouts' belief in God and not allowing
Homosexual Scout Leaders:
President Bush supports Boy Scouts' stand.
John Kerry opposes boy Scouts' stand.

* Asking for God's blessing on America:
President Bush often asks God to bless America in his speeches.
John Kerry attacks Bush for mentioning God so often.

* Judges:
President bush says "We need common-sense judges who believe
our rights are derived from God."
John Kerry insists on judges who support the ACLU's radical
anti-Christian, anti-God, anti-family agenda.
John Kerry is insistent on blocking President Bush's
federal judge appointments.

* Overall Record:
President Bush does not vote on issues before Congress
but, based on his publicly stated positions, would
receive an 85% conservative rating.

John Kerry, according to the highly respected,
politically-neutral National Journal,
rates Kerry the most liberal U. S. Senator in 2003 -
- more liberal than Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton.

With help from you and many others, we hope to
distribute 25,000,000 copies of this Voter information
across the United States.

and again and again and again and AGAIN

4 more years!
 

Dale Walkowsk

New Member
I'm just a simple Southwest GA redneck that "doesn't play games with peoples words "and there was no hidden meanings as to how I feel about war in what I typed.

"Basically you stated you would support a war if the circumstances suited your needs."

Squirtgun...you don't find this inconsistant and playing with peoples words?
 

squirtgun

New Member
Ok,so your support or non-support for a war depends on the circumstances that let up to that war.You don't support this war or this president and I do.
Once again there is no secret messages in what I type,it's just my take on things as I see them.
Some where along they way most people have forgotten everyone has an opinion and they are like a&%holes,we all have one.
 

Dale Walkowsk

New Member
Squirtgun sez...

Some where along they way most people have forgotten everyone has an opinion and they are like a&%holes,we all have one.

You got that right LOL.
 

David Saulque

<b>PWN TEAM - Hood Moderator</b><br<b><font color=
So the UN is now part of the process. In the last Gulf War the UN was part of the process and the DNC candidate voted against the war process. What you have is a candidate that only votes in a hyper partisan way. In short he would never cross party lines even if the issue was correct.

Get a real tight grip on yourself, GWB will be in for another 4 years-Why because of the poor selection of the DNC-OH-could it have been planned this way so that the real brains behind Clinton and the humanistic approach as expressed at Waco under General Reno-& the one and only Senator Hilary R. Clinton. [white]
 
Last edited:

Dixiedrifter

New Member
The war in iraq was created by bushy to take our eyes off the economy, and it was based on false information.

Kerry supported bush because he wanted to look good in the eyes of voters and probably did not pay that much attention to the reports.

Saddam was the best ally we had in the war against terror. Sure he was a dictator, sure he killed a lot of innocent folks, but the fact is that he had to rule those <i>people</i> with an iron fist or else they would have taken over.

Saddam did what we are trying to do now, and did it for free.

Now in the post Saddam Iraq, we gots 400 tons of high explosives missing, democratic elections where the ppl only want to elect radical islamic fundamentalists that hate america and support terrorism.

Now how is the world a safter place post Saddam?
 

Aplus

New Member
Dixiedrifter said:
Saddam was the best ally we had in the war against terror. Sure he was a dictator, sure he killed a lot of innocent folks, but the fact is that he had to rule those <i>people</i> with an iron fist or else they would have taken over.

Saddam did what we are trying to do now, and did it for free.

Now in the post Saddam Iraq, we gots 400 tons of high explosives missing, democratic elections where the ppl only want to elect radical islamic fundamentalists that hate america and support terrorism.

Now how is the world a safter place post Saddam?

The problem is that we didn't see and understand this in advance.

On the other hand, the middle east has never been at peace so why whould we have thought we could facilitate it now?
 
O

OrangeCrest

Guest
It's time for Bush to step out of office...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6323933/

How many of our men and women, not mention the world now being at risk, are going to die because of this?

This had to be hauled off in semis, roughly 22-semi rolling down the road... Why wasn't it destroyed?

Sick sick sick....

Our people might as well pack up and come home now... The world is going to be blowing up everywhere now..
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dan S

New Member
Dan S said:
Subject: Records
2004 Election Voter Guide

Depending on the way you lean, the following information
could have a bearing on decisions you make in November 2004.

Issues of Importance = *

* Gay Marriage:
President Bush is opposed.
John Kerry favors.

* Partial-Birth Abortion:
President Bush is opposed.
John Kerry favors.

* Restoring voluntary prayer in the public schools:
President Bush Favors.
John Kerry is Opposed.

* Mel Gibson & the making of a film about Christ:
President Bush supports Gibson.
John Kerry participated in Left's assault on Gibson, suggesting
possible anti-Semitism even though Kerry had not seen the film.

* Boy Scouts' belief in God and not allowing
Homosexual Scout Leaders:
President Bush supports Boy Scouts' stand.
John Kerry opposes boy Scouts' stand.

* Asking for God's blessing on America:
President Bush often asks God to bless America in his speeches.
John Kerry attacks Bush for mentioning God so often.

* Judges:
President bush says "We need common-sense judges who believe
our rights are derived from God."
John Kerry insists on judges who support the ACLU's radical
anti-Christian, anti-God, anti-family agenda.
John Kerry is insistent on blocking President Bush's
federal judge appointments.

* Overall Record:
President Bush does not vote on issues before Congress
but, based on his publicly stated positions, would
receive an 85% conservative rating.

John Kerry, according to the highly respected,
politically-neutral National Journal,
rates Kerry the most liberal U. S. Senator in 2003 -
- more liberal than Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton.

With help from you and many others, we hope to
distribute 25,000,000 copies of this Voter information
across the United States.



[white] Just vote man just vote! [white]


[white] While `ya at it vote for da man BUSH [white]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Our Sponsors

Top